The arguments against AI are clear in art. Most visual artists hate mid -midgrani, stability AI, and similar image generators, eliminating data without compensation and general attacks “The malfunction goes. But is it possible for creative tasks to deliberately misuse generative AI?
Auckland, based in Auckland, California, uses the tool as a tool to the image generators. Instead of passing large quantities of general images-which it calls itself addicted and mind-blowing “fast art”-the rich machine is focused on building and destroying the world. He was impressed with his day job in San Francisco Kinko in the late 90s, long before he was broken as a Award -winning painterWhen he kept the trash and plants in photocopies to make colleges. Now, he is pointing to playing an LLM in an invented language, in which the visual view loop between generative images and human intervention is incited.
Amori has focused on the World Building and Distining the Machine
“We are still in a very strange moment for artists when it is not clear what moral purpose is around AI art,” says Ben Davis, an art critic in Brooklyn. Writes About Technology And Hardship. “If you use it, you will be attacked by people. On the other hand – it exists. I don’t think it will go back to the box.”
As Davis notes, artists have been manipulating AI for some time. In 2022, Stef Major Swanson indicated AI to make Marilyn Brando’s “opponent”, which created a nightmare. A woman whose name was Lab. The so -called “Ai Corps” became A memeAnd the example of this was seen by some other users in employment images Minus And Weight Hint
For a show of 2023, Laurie Siemens “accurate” AI Tolls with digital editing as well as handicranging, painting, and stitching to echo incomplete Dell E and stable dispersion rendering. “Ideal Cultural Memory” The women with whom they grew up. He felt that the program was a new type of partner. “
Such techniques can be traced.Malfunction art“In which artists make technology errors aesthetic. In the late 1960s and 1970s, artists used electronic processing and video defects. Named names like June Pike and Jud Yakot changed the sections. A hard day’s night In fact Beatles Electronic. With the advent of the World Wide Web in the 1990s, John Hamskark and Dirk Peaceman created Judy collectiveWho used the error from the ASCII display to make pictures – and they changed the classic of 1992 Wolfstein 3D In the video game a Straped Downt First Person Summary forms.
Amori has created its AI error in the direction of the World Building with an 800 -page thread with Chat GPT. He claims that he has convinced the LLM to act like a sprinty, supporting it in the physical world with Amori. The Amori will produce an image and ask Chattgat to describe it in the invention of the invention, which he calls Aiglyphic913.
He can then use the detail to use more image generation immediately and edit the results with Photoshop. Or he can print the results to work, using the Venusian glazing technique demanding Venus from Baruk away, then creates a photo of his physical painting of extra AI change. He wants to reduce the trend of “Fast Art” KAI with his pentheri technique, who won it Mathematics Polk Crosser Foundation Award For 2023-2024. Inspired by “Molch”, Alan Jinnzberg’s Curry De Quiver about the material that eliminated the soul, Hybrid paintings of Amori Immediately paint the character-a mysterious, powerful, called “selfless” that disturbs our world, speaks a language that we cannot understand.
Davis describes such techniques as an artist’s AI girlfriend. “Basically, these things are black mirrors, and if you say, ‘I want you to be bad,’ and you will talk to him for a long time, it will eventually produce a personality according to your choice. It can be very enthusiastic, because these things are capable of presenting your things.”
Nevertheless, Davis says that the trend of digital culture has to be used in every way to reduce the value of any image. Since the tools can easily and convinced any visual style, the audience is married to the content, which makes them usually likely to ignore or ignore the images, even if it is fine. “These machines are a tool on the Day of Resurrection to eliminate people’s abilities to catch the world creatively,” says Davis.
The artists are not going quietly. Obviously, the artists have Tech companies objected to the pictures of “Injest” In their production model without permission or compensation. After free training to the AI, tech companies now assume the use of the world’s collective artistic heritage for their benefit, regardless of if it removes countless artists from work. Some artists have joined more and more Two dozen legal fodder Against Generative AI companies for theft of intellectual property. Are the other The use of software tools called Night Shade and Glays Which deliberately misleads his work against abusing AI models. (After the night shades and the street, after the small “riots” were born in the pixels, speculation is speculated that the poisonous image in its model can no longer go properly.)
Davis notes that the copyright of the AI created imagery is not determined by itself. Have courts Not yet convinced That a person who uses a signal to enlighten a machine -made image can get a copyright result. But if a human artist changes the AI-influential image, it may be able to protect copyright.
Davis noted that, in January, a “disgusting icon” called “the same piece of American cheese” Became First AI-Infield Image to Be CopyrightAccording to the Inc., the Inc., because the CEO of the company, which managed to carefully document its humanitarian partnership. However, Nora Sheeland, who is the spokesman US Copyright OfficeTold Stuffy“Since the office issued copyright registration guidance in March 2023, the office has registered more than a thousand tasks that include AI-generated content, which covers the human author’s contribution to registration.”
“These machines are the tool on the Day of Resurrection to eliminate people’s abilities to catch the world creatively.”
Amori is sympathetic to copyright problems, as he also copied his work and sold it in the name of someone else. However, for his Aiglyphic913 project, he says the amount he changes the images made from the raw machine means that he has little concern that he will face a copyright case, such as Photographer Patrick Kerry fought with artist Richard Prince. For,,,,,,,,,, for,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,, for,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,, for,,, for,,, for,,, for,,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,,,, for,, for,.Prince marked Kerry’s pictures “Louisenges,” righteousness with guitars and other items. After five years, an appeal court ruled in 2014 that 25 of the 30 painting that Prince had painted were an example of “fair use” exceptions, and the remaining five were out of court. He says, “We have been in post -Modernism like the 80s.
Davis suggests that Amori and other artists use AI, are in the “moment of negotiations”, and are trying to find a way to use the tools that is really interesting and creative. But they are struggling with the fact that AI has reduced the value of the style, once an important sign of artistic reality. “Whenever you make a unique style, there is a very wide program that can see it, summarize its features, and regenerate it. And so it naturally… reduces the value of the style.” “I don’t think artists in the future will be praised in their style. They will be praised from the creative universe, which they create, what they create.”
