One of the reasons for the mention of AI, especially in creative places, is found a bit of aerol. There are actually many. It is trained on stolen content for starters, looting real artists and credit and income authors. In addition, it is often very bad, especially when it comes to realistic articles. Language models like Chat GPT are very badly known for cheating, and because of this, real shops like Chicago Sun Times have been printed for summer reading list.
Multiple shops have covered the story, like Articanica And StuffyAnd of course I’m doing it here now. It may be that we are encouraged to indicate to some extent that when the AI fills in a writing site, considering that people want to keep their jobs to it. But it was 404Which is a salary post, which found the origin of the fake list that took its own path in a few posts.
Chicago Sun Times issued a post BluskyWhich passes the deer on the situation. “We are considering how it has made it print when we speak,” it is written, “it is not an editorial content and was not approved by the Sun Times newsroom.
This shows that the list was purchased from a colleague of posts, and came from the media collective herit. The list contains some real books, but it is also vague by some people who do not exist, who collect both real and fabricated authors. Even it points to non -existent blog posts, and is usually just confronted. Especially for everyone who is really trying to raise his hand when reading their recommended summer.
The byline on the list belongs to Marco Buscalia, who managed to track 404. Initially, Buscalia confessed to using AI in her work, but made it clear that she always examined the mistakes. He told 404, “This time, I didn’t and I couldn’t believe that I remembered it because it was very clear. There is no excuse,” he told him 404. “100 % on me and I’m completely ashamed.”
This is not unique. Similar articles were also found, without lines, which had clearly fabricated information with fake people’s references. About “Summer Food Trends”, a doctor’s expert price was not available, and at the same time, nothing that people never said. It is likely that when it comes to published AI content, it is the only tip of the iceberg.
It has come at a time when many posts due to budget deductions turn to AI’s content to save money, but this is definitely a matter of getting your price. The sad fact is that good, s, well -researched, and well -written materials have very little money for authors, then there was. I say as someone who has seen the publication after the publication in my industry, except for the talented and dedicated journalists without any work.
This is another reminder that we have to be careful about what we read in both print and online. It is also a reminder for people who use AI that these things are a tool. They need to be used caution and properly with proper monitoring. It is very important to take all your information with a healthy diet of esopticism, no matter how you go to readers.
