Abstract
In an attempt to avoid destructive launch, the EA has set up a battlefield labs, a way to provide input and feedback for the next title for the community.
However, it quickly became a source of leak, some of which were contexts and potentially harmful.
With the Reddate, the community manager of the game spoke against the leaks and those who reduced the community -based move.
Back in February, the EA broke the silence about its next episode in the battlefield franchise. In introducing the battlefield labs, the studio confirmed the desire to avoid another catastrophic launch in partnerships with concerts through deep closed tests.
Shortly afterwards, more than 1.3 million people tried to sign up for the battlefield labs in hoping to create a game, which cannot be expected to be launched before April 2026. As of March 7, the footage of the playst was already being leaked directly and online. If the players were not moving their gameplay forward, they were sharing their opinions online, despite all this, despite a non -diagnosis agreement, or agreement with the NDA.
Matters came to the fore earlier this week, when the Data Meddest Internal Code suggests that the next battlefield game -based match -making (SBMM) will have some form. Naturally, he sent the community to a spiral, leading to producer David Sirland to comment on the matter, explaining to the fans “to calm the item”, while explaining what is happening.
Relevant
If he wants to be successful, battlefield 6 needs boring
Electronic arts and dice need to return to their roots for battlefield 6.
Now, its community manager has also taken a stand against the leakage.
If everyone is leaking everything, Labs do not work on the battlefield
In a long post jointly on ReddateGlobal community manager T0talfps told players effectively that the leaks were not helping the situation, especially when they come from a place where they lack context.
Specifically, he noted that the team has long wanted to implement the battlefield labs, “Answering your requests for maximum joining and returning this kind of reaction to the battlefield.”
However, “the information and the content that is shared is beyond the context and often with the story wrapped around it, which is damaging the trust and transparency that we want to establish.” Thus, if they violate the NDA, people will be removed.
In a final note, he re -established that things “are only official when we share it, and we are pleased with this topic.”
It is no secret that the leak can be very harmful, especially when there is a lack of information around them. As was the case of SBMM leak, which sent the community into panic. In addition to getting down the leaked strictly, it remains to be seen what can be done to avoid maximum damage or information from the EA from time to time and incorrectly.
.jpg?q=49&fit=crop&w=422&h=268&dpr=2)
Next
I miss when each game has a tricky multi -player mode
If it was not good, at least, it was clean.
