The battlefield community is debating about a new mechanic in the games that most of them have not played. The Labs Test in the next battlefield, which only has access to a few players, is going to experiment with something that hit the nerves for many, and it caused a bit of stir.
As you can be expected, the dice and the next battlefield development team uses labs to swim the ideas and mechanics to get the opinions of the players. According to its nature, some of them are going to be more popular than others, but there has been a different dialogue about this latest change.
Since he opened his doors for testing, and everyone saw all the leak footage, the general consensus about the battlefield labs has been incredibly positive. I put myself on a lot of leaks and what I saw was very hopeful of the next game.
But you cannot expect it, especially since the point of all this exercise is to test and repeat it, which inevitably means that some of what goes into each building will not be in line with the choice of each. The next labs blood will not be banned in the blood, which allows each class to use any weapon.
This makes the signed weapons path, a new system designed to encourage players to stick to their class identity. Each class has a type of weapon that is designed to integrate with its identity, and when doing so, only this class gets bonuses. For example, Rican Class can catch his breath longer when using sniper rifles. As the developer explained A blog postHowever, some types of weapons – such as DMR, carbains, and shotguns do not offer any bonuses when used by any class.
This is a part of the design of the Dice design for the new class system, and the developer said that the signature system operates on other aspects. Each class has a sign of signature. Significantly, players have only control over their weapons package. They can either go with the default, or to make themselves in mind, keeping in mind what to get/lose from each choice.
Although no one has been able to try new changes in the game, this news has not been particularly well received. One is that it is not right with the idea of putting boundaries on the attachments of the weapons, which shows the first construction. It also reminds players to work on the battlefield 2042, a title whose biggest sin is to become a game of battlefield.
Ever since the blog post has been running directly, talks on the Reddate of the government field have been underway. Many The restrictions want to remainBut many other Don’t think it is a realistic expectation For the 2025 shooter who is trying to appeal to others – duty players’ call audience.
The battlefield series has had a complex history with weapons sanctions. As old as the game is, it is as likely that you can find harsh limits on what kind of weapons can be equipped by each class. There is no excellent solution to this, and it is easy to identify how this or how this choice has made a class/under -power.
Later, the games of the series tried to lighten these limits by making class-organistic weapons type, usually carbains that perform well in a variety of boundaries. As many old fans of the battlefield will tell you, however, sanctions are a basic part that makes a good battlefield game great. Working with it and choosing the proposed system can be far from class identity, and can eliminate class reliance that leads to the development of the best sports sports.
