The CD project said in January 2024 that the AI ”can help improve some process preparations, but cannot replace people,” a rich statement that has difficulty eliminating any real stand. During today’s financial year 2024, however, Joint CEO Mika ł Novakoski specified something else on the subject, saying that the Generative AI is not using the Studio Vacher 4 or other development games. Not because the results are usually duddi, but due to potential legal confusion.
In response to a question about the use of Generative AI in the future games of the CD project, Novakoski said, “I think we have mentioned before the previous year, we have set up a team that is investigating the potential use of AI solutions in our future products, including our own custom development.” “And we have research projects. However, they are not really necessary to focus on productive AI.
“General Ai, tell the truth, when it comes to legal IP ownership, etc. and many other aspects are talked about. So when it comes to the implementation of any general AI in the original sports, when we talk about Vachar 4 or any project in the near future, we really have nothing.”
The CD project is rarely the first company to prevent legal concerns around Generative AI: for example, Gati banned the AI photos uploading and selling their photos on the concerns that the algorithm used to make them has been trained in the content that they are not legally entitled. The valve expressed similar concerns when it rejected the game that featured AI infiltration art from Steam in 2023.
The valve said at the time, “The introduction of AI can sometimes make it difficult to show that a developer has considerable rights to use AI to make an asset, including photos, text and music.” “In particular, there is some legal uncertainty about the data used to train AI models.”
Beyond the scope of this story, the use of copyright substances has become a major problem beyond the scope of this story. But the short version is that large -scale, billions of dollars of AI companies claim that they cannot survive without taking advantage of the content that they do not have rights, some artists and journalists who really create things are retreating, and while it is generally a good thing that big corporations will have a lot of realization, and their ability to finally find questions.
And yes, AI-inflatory art is useless. This is also a very relevant point.
Novakoski said, “The use of General AI is not completely off the table in what is in the future of Vachar 4, Cyberpank 2078, or CD project: If the question of rights and ownership has been properly fixed,” we can see it. “But in particular, nothing is happening with General AI.”
Talking about things that are not happening soon, the CD project also said today that Vachar 4 2027 will not be out at any time.
