Our favorite handheld gaming was launched by the PCI 4.0 extension by the PC 3 310, the main PC 310 of the badly influenced storage capacity found in the PC. Yes, you can catch steam deck OLED or ASUS Rogue Eli with a ton of storage straight from the gate, but prices hikes are not efficient at cost compared to the base model. Usually, both of them and both of them are usually supported by M2 drives, and upgrading them is relatively easy to ease, instead it makes it more understandable to replace this storage with larger, better, later SSD.
The first P310 came in the game. Complete its compact with 2230 form factor. The main P310, Western Digital’s WD_black SN770M, Courser’s MP600 Mini, and a large part of the other 2230 drives provided concrete solutions for the problem. However, in the case of the WD and the major, they both brought significant defects.
For the P310, he told 232 layer QLC Nand, while the WD had 112 layer TLC Nand. Effectively, you can choose a “cheap” solution with the key to $ 215 for a 2 TB unit that has all the defects QLC well known. Or (at the time of writing) $ 220 for the 1 TBWD black unit, but the resulting age 112 layer TLC and slowly with speed.
Although yes, technically, you can run one of your gaming rig (they are still on the M2 form element), they are still very tasting boys and are not honest for it.
The main P310 2280 spears
The ability: 1 TB
Interface: PCIE 4.0 x4
Memory Controller: Festive E -27 T
Flash memory: Micron 232 layer QLC Nand
Rating Performance: 7,100 MB/S Read Permanent, 6,000 MB/S Permanent Writing
Personal: 220 TBW
Guidance: guidance Five years
ELSE: $ 70 | £ 70
This is where the P310 M.2 2280 is in different types. All the features that were in the small 2230 steam deck drive, but in turn, with a large form factor, better prices and far more performance. Important hope is this size change, this prescription, it is enough to move from its place instead of being just a “another steam deck SSD” and pushes it to one of the best SSDs that you can still get your hands today, certainly from the point of view of the value.
The top line sunglasses between the two form factors are the same. They are both single -sided designs, both have a feature of micron 232 layer QLC nand, both have drums, and both use a drama lace four channel design made on the back of the Fiest’s E -27T controller (TSMC’s 12 NM process.
Topline performance data for 2280 is also similar to its small cousin. Even by comparing the 1TB model on the test here, you are looking at 7,100 MB/s on the sequence reading and 6,000 MB/s on writing, which has a total number of 220 TBW on the front of tolerance, which doubles up to 440 TBW for 2TB variations. This is not fully fully, but you get a five -year solid warranty to back it, and ideally you will not use this drive for anything more than gaming.
PC Gamer Test Bench
CPU: AMD Ryzen 99900x | Rum: 64GB (2x32GB) Team Group T Crete Specialist DDR5 @ 6000 C34 | GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super | Mother Board: Asus Rog Strix X870E-E Gaming Wi-Fi | CPU Cooler: Asus rog Ryujin III 360 Argb Extreme | Psu: 1200W NZXT C1200 (2024) 80+ Gold | Chassis: The geometric future model 5
And that’s the case. The QLC is not merely in keeping with the burden of professional work. Not only does this lack of endurance, but in my experience, without the appropriate size cache, the large file transfer loses fast after time filling with the cache or the drive is heated. The QLC is dedicated to the catching in the P 310, but it is not as effective as it is purely dedicated DDR4 drama solution. Nevertheless, even during the game download and install, it is likely that you will never hit the barrier, so this is a dumb point, as long as it is chosen in mind.
In my test, P310 certainly reached my promise. Especially for $ 70 drive. The crystal disk completely targeted the setting data, which has an average of 7,109 MB/s on and writing 6,035 MB/s on writing, with comfortable performance on random 4K data. In fact, the 4K reading speed is far less than what I want to see, and it fails to compete with its 2230 cousin’s choice, but it is comfortable throwing the latest Samsung’s latest 990 Evo Plus. Although this is not particularly difficult.
The 3D mark storage figures were also comfortable, scoring 2,999 runs on the index as a whole, and a Max Bandothy reported 517.77, which is less than its 2230 cousins. Then the final fantasy XIV Shadow is a burden time in the Burkers. Rather, the interesting thing is, he scored 7.305 seconds against 8.101 of 2230. Interestingly, FF XIV attracts the incredible amount of the system when marking the bench. There is a chance that it can cause more heat in the controller as it loads the benchmark scenes, which slows down the load times, as the small drive cannot handle this heat permanently than 2280. Although this is just speculation.
If buy …
✅ You are just gaming and requires 1 TB storage: Perfect if you are looking for a secondary storage drive that is able to hold some sports and you do not intend to do anything other than gaming.
If not buy …
❌ You need 2TB storage: In direct words, there are very little extra costs on this ability, there are better options for TLC, and they run a ring around P310 2280.
Nevertheless, it has been supported by the temperature testing. I benchmarking both P310S on the X870E-E from ASUS, with his own built-in full fat heat sink on top of them, and 2280 different types of traveling on an amazing 18 degree cooler than his small counterpart, as well as 2 degrees. Thanks to this expansion (common) form factor, it has allowed the important to keep the nand package away from the stick and from the controller, which can help a lot of heat construction.
So, then looks beautiful, okay? Well, let’s talk about the price because it’s a big deal, and it’s a place where things get a little complicated. At the level, I here 1 TB unit comes at an impressive $ 70. 7 0.07 per gigabyte. This is actually the cheapest drive I have tested to date, which is much cheaper than its 2230 counterpart, and it makes $ 15 cheaper than the latest WD’s latest 1 TBSN 7100 model, claiming a much better TLC.
However, the problem occurs when you measure it up to 2 TB 2280. In short, in this capacity, the price tag is slide in 5 135. It is still not bad, but it is only $ 5 cheaper than 2 TB SN7100. For this savings, you are getting worse, bad performance, bad endurance, and usually a drive that struggles to maintain your TLC counterpart in almost every move.
Nevertheless, if you are after a solid, reliable 1 TB budget drive that can happily meet your gaming needs and nothing, P310 is a reasonable choice. Nevertheless, if you are also thinking of lightly 2 TB and beyond, or feel like a variety of workloads all the time and besides, and can also pull an additional $ 5, then any other TLC solution is just better value and far more versatile.
