Sometimes march goes on. A little bit of a clutch, they; Nevertheless, T705 is a serious example of this concept, we move the modest human hardware to the absolute limit and then to something. Launching the middle of last year, at this time, the main announcement announced that T705 was the world’s fastest Gen5 SSD, which immediately reads 14.5GB/S sequence immediately and more than 12.7 GB/Sec (for high capacity model). It was designed alike for concerts and professionals who could use the horrific amount of bandwidth offered by Pulki Jane 5 drive. Even it came with a sexy limited edition white variety, which you want if you want (of a premium of a premium)), complete with large, chicken, block, non -removable heat sink.
And, at least, he really fulfilled that promise.
But since then the times have changed, and the similar drives are finally getting out of wood work a dozen one penny (especially with the choice of falling at our doorstep like Samsung’s 9100 Pro). Nevertheless, he forced me to think, is it a brot force drive, an engineer powerhouse with this skill, is still to fight against something modern and the greatest? Is it appropriate to wear the crown of one of the best SSDs of the PC gamer, or is it made more efficient, more powerful, or more efficient?
At least, compared to the main T700, as far as the hardware is not a big difference between the two. Overall, the special sheet is very familiar. It still has the features that Fisen E6 -Eight Channel controller, which has drum cache (dual -sided), and still packs Micron’s 232 layers to TLC Nand Flash (it is worth indicating that the major micron is brand). In fact, this is the same hardware used in the entire board for this first batch of PCI 5.0 drives, which launched back with Fisen’s reference design in 2023, which includes courser MP 700, Seaget’s Fire Koda 540, and Gigabite’s Oravis Jain 5 10000. What is here is the speed and price of the bus, the price and the price.
The main T705 spectacle
The ability: 1 TB
Interface: PCIE 5.0 x4
Memory Controller: Facence e -26
Flash memory: Micron 232 layer tlc nand
Rating Performance: 13,600 MB/S SEQ. Read, 10,200 MB/S seq. Write
Personal: 600 TBW
Guidance: guidance Five years
ELSE: 3 153 | 6 136
Really here is relatively remagly even the only major change here. The E26 controller is operating at a full bus speed of 2,400 MT/S, while the main T700 MT/S and earlier carcass, is on Gigabytes, and the reference offer was only running at 1,600 MT/S. Clearly, this is a hell of a feat to get with E26, and you can tell, even with a chinky built -in heat sink, in my 1 TB sample is at the top of its 2 TB T700 siblings at a slight temperature.
As far as capabilities are concerned, this is a usual matter, with 1 TB, 2 TB, and 4 TB options available respectively, respectively, in both variations, both heat sinked and non -hat -Sansa. If you are after the speed of 14 GB/S., you want to capture 2 TB solutions and above solutions. Even less, and the single nand package is going to leave you behind, there is a barrier, even though random 4K numbers are still very good, even despite the sole package, it is a beautiful concrete choice for the gamers.
A word on the heat sink. Generally, I advise you that whatever drive is available depends on whether the drive is the cheapest or offering. However, in the case of T705, its hat sink is designed to be inaccessible. You can remove it, but we’re talking about screwdrivers, pliers application, and heat sink fully bending, below which there is a serious risk of damaging the SSD. At the same time, it is two -way, it may not be able to play with any thermal pad that is also located under the Mother Board heat sink. Recently. , If your board gets a solid M.2 hat sink, then hold a variety of non -hat sink.
So, the number
Generally, in some cases great, extraordinary. Litanis is ridiculously less in the 3 -mark storage benchmark, which scored a surprising 39 NS. According to an estimated, it is below the single -nand package, though, when it comes to raising the sequence of speed, it can be harmful, reality delays, and in turn, after random access times in some applications. This is the thing you can see evenly in the random 4K test of the Christalds Mark, its written data has provided 329 MB/S impressively 329 MB/second, which is only defeated by the MP 700 Elite of the courser, and the latest Samsung’s latest 9100 Pro, with a low -lying 9100 Pro.
PC Gamer Test Bench
CPU: AMD Ryzen 99900x | Rum: 64GB (2x32GB) Team Group T Crete Specialist DDR5 @ 6000 C34 | GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super | Mother Board: Asus Rog Strix X870E-E Gaming Wi-Fi | CPU Cooler: Asus rog Ryujin III 360 Argb Extreme | Psu: 1200W NZXT C1200 (2024) 80+ Gold | Chassis: The geometric future model 5
If buy …
✅ You want a fast os SSD: Low lettuce and high random 4K performance, if you can make an extra cost, provide some epic real -world performance.
If not buy …
❌ You are looking for value purchase: Will you make a difference in comparison to the T700 or MP700 elite? Maybe not. Although this is an impressive solution to engineering, it is a severe price conflict to justify it.
As a result, the sequential performance is low. Upon writing, he reads 13,511 MB/S and 10,028 MB/S, but this will really affect only those who work with large order files instead of gamers. If you are a professional art worker or so, a variety of different conditions of at least 1 TB are not so compulsory.
If the temperature is concerned, T705 came to the top at 84 ° C, using this built -in heat sink. This is quite high, and although it is manageable, it only shows how far we have come to the controller tech. For example, the courser’s firm is very impressive in terms of the E321T comparison, and, although yes, the sequential performance board is less than 3GB/S, but it is about 30 degrees Cooler.
Last year, the main T705, there is no doubt that the king of the hill was. It also presented the outstanding order performance and the highly aggressive random 4K performance, definitely for the moment.
But even today, the big problem is price. In its 1 TB Configure, you are talking about a clear value of 3 153, or 6 136 (writing time). This is about $ 0.15 per GB or £ 0.14. On the contrary, the courser’s MP700 elite stands with $ 0.09 and £ 0.10 per GB data. Even the main T700 manages $ 0.12 and £ 0.09. This is a problem, because both of those drives are so close to T705 on the measurement of these real world.
Yes, theoretically T705 is the fastest drive, and it is better round than Samsung’s latest 9100 pro, which is suffering from poor writing performance, but, unless you can benefit from these extra 1-3 GB/S, this is a real struggle to justify this cost.
Amazing engineering feat? Absolutely for it for gaming? Not yet.
