Love or hate it, Frame Generation Software is a great feature of gaming graphics updates.
AMD’s new Feltifx Super Resolution (FSR) 4 Frame offers massive updates for gene software Redon 9070 and 9070 XT Disaguces GPUSTo allow the new RDNA 4 architecture to allow AMD’s new GPUs to 3.7x better than pure silicon power.
Although we are unlikely to see the variations of the new Radian GPU AMD Release Mobile, we can see that some of the RDNA -4 tech make the Rising Z2 Generation and Raizen AI 300 series of Integrated graphics tiles on the AI ​​-300 series chip sets.
Although there are some discriminatory opinions around the frame gene software, it may be a game changer for handheld gaming PC. However, AMD’s AFMF 2 updates paved the performance on ASUS ROG ELLY X.
So, can FSR 4 do the same?
FSR 4 Performance
Based on the AMD benchmark data, the FSR4 Optclub alone offers a significant improvement in RDNA 4 Redon 9000 Series GPU’s pure silicon performance in multiple games alone.
According to the Redon 9000 Series Silicon Title, the 39-97 frames per second (FPS) offers 4K gaming speed. With the FSR4 applisions, this limit is transferred to 78-134 FPS. With the activation of FSR4 upscaling and frame generation, the Redon offers a frame rate of 144 to 233 FPS to achieve 3.7x performance.
Now, these benchmarks are provided by the AMD, and are using Radian 9070 XT GPU with FSR4 in “Performance” mode, AMD Ryzen 7 9800x3d, 32GB DDR5 memory, and a MSI MEG X670E Ace Mother Board in test configuration. The game was played in 4K (3840 x 2160) in “Ultra,” “extreme,” and “Maxide” prostations.
Although we prefer the standard of certified performance independently, these GPUs were just announced, so we will need to wait until the review restriction will need to see how they check through media outlets and analysts.
Based on these results, the FSR 4 looks like a beautiful solid update compared to the previous version of the software.
Comparing FSR4 benefits is also interesting to compare NVIDIA RTX 50-series, as NVIDIA flagship GPU is also struggling to play at 60FPS, with more requirements, nvidia’s DLSS 4 frames can be completed while relying on genes software.
AMD Ryzen Z2 Series vs. Raizen Z 1 and Intel Lunar Lake
AMD announced Raizen Z 2 SeriesIn the CES earlier this year, the second generation of gaming handheld chips.
We have so far seen only one system with the second -generation’s Raizen Z2 chip, Lenovo Lashkar G G, which has the Raisen Z2 Go processor. If you take a look at the Raisen Z2 Generation, Z2Go is the highest budget friendly processor, as it has old Zen 3 CPU architecture, RNDA 2GPU architecture, and only 4 CPU cores. So, Z2 goes are not thrilling at all.
Raizen Z 2 and Z2 exstream are far more impressive chip sets, though Raizen Z2 is much matching in terms of Zen 4 and RDNA 3 architecture compared to the Rising Z1 Extra. However, software differences make the difference between Z2 and Z1 extremely “night and day”. Although the Asos Rogie El X will probably be one of our favorite gaming handhelds, the reason for the update of the Raisen Z2 series is the reason.
| Row 0 – Cell 0 | CPU architecture | IGPU architecture | CPU Cores | CPU Threads | GPU Cores | Cash | CTDP |
Raizen Z 2 Extra | Zen 5 | RDNA 3.5 | 8 cover | 16 thread | 16 cover | 24 mb | 15-35W |
Raizen Z 2 | Zen 4 | RDNA 3 | 8 cover | 16 thread | 12 cover | 24 mb | 15-30W |
Raizen Z 2 Go | Zen 3 | RDNA 2 | 4 cover | 8 thread | 12 cover | 10 mb | 15-30W |
Down line
If the AMDR can bring DNA 4 updates to the old architecture in the FSR, or if the FSR4 Tech AMD’s fluid motion frames (AFMF) can affect the update of tech, it can help the playground with the Intel’s Core Ultra 200 Var Load Lake AMD level. Although the lunar lake is no handheld chip, Intel’s internal teams are dedicated to the handheld market, and the raw power of the Intel Arc Igpo of the lunar lake has greatly improved the Z1 as we have seen on MSI claws 8 AI+.
Although we do not do benchmarks with super sampling tech, we have testified that the “Strexpoint” of the lunar lake AMD’s “Strexpoint” Resin A300 series RDNA 3.5 is better than architecture. F1 24 At 1080p with medium -sized settings.
The FSR4 is currently a Radian 9000 series special, but if AMDFSR4 can bring in old architecture in a few months, it may change in a few months.
We can also see that if the software needs RDNA 4 architecture, FSR4 is available in the future on AMD chips such as Raizen AI 400 series and Rising Z3 Generation. It is not as if either chip has been announced or it has been indicated by AMD, but the Raisen AI300 series will be a summer at the age of 2025, so we will likely see some of the AIPC chip refreshments from AIPC later this year.
Regardless of personal feelings, frame jinn software can have a major impact on gaming experiences. Whether you choose to enable the frame gene, it depends on you.
When I talk about laptops and handhelds instead of desktops because of the hardware limits of these form factors, I see a better case for FSR, DLSS, and Zes. But this is a matter of my personal opinion.
