Every opportunity is that the cost of GTA 6 will cost around $ 80 – it has not been confirmed, but the wind is definitely changing this way. This is in accordance with the Xbox website, which Tell users some bad news“Some of our new, first -party games will be launched at 79.99.”
I should note that when Rock Star is owned by Tech to Interactive, not Microsoft, it still indicates a change in the big budget industry and, honestly, seeing the ridiculous graphical loyalty of GTA 6? If the cost of any game is $ 80, it will be the same.
Former PlayStation Boss and Sony Weight, Shohi Yoshida, who left the company after 38 years in 2024, thinks it is just a matter of time. “It was going to be sooner or later,” he explains PlayStationide. “Perhaps not from Nintendo, but eventually it was about to happen.”
The problem, he said, is inflation. Which is an uncertainty but the correct answer is also: “We live in conflicting times, where inflation is real and important, but people expect that sports that are still more proud and therefore it is expensive to grow for its price. This is an impossible equation.”
In fact, companies “want to diversify their income” to fund the ever -funding scale of these projects. This includes all of this remixes and Remster: “Basically, the spread of remistans and remixes does not really come out of the desire to bring any old memories or sports latest, but this is a kind of ‘easy’ solution to bring profits that ultimately helps finance new sports.
PC ports are part of this equation, but they say this is not so much problem because they have been developed by support studios – I am inclined to agree with it, but mostly because I want to play this game on PC someday. Cough, blood produced, cough. It also highlighted, a low -seor part, “a subscription platform and game as a service”.
If GTA 6 is concerned, he does not know whether the “rock star will jump on the spot” to raise the price by $ 80-or even $ 90, all tolded. But he says, “Production costs and sports prices are essential.
“GTA 6 will be clearly a matter, but if you take the example of clear tools: campaign 33, the game is exactly unusual, despite the fact that the team has only thirty people. It is one of the leading people, in my view, because you can make the best game with tough teams and budgets without compromising.”
This is a bit ridiculous in confession Wide outbreak meme ‘I want small games with the worst graphics created by people who are paid more to work and I’m not joking’ basically is a more professional, in executive terms by one of the industry’s longest standing data. But that is not completely wrong. They are not saying at the mention of the budget, ‘more paying for less work’.
Claire Obaskar: Campaign 33 is an interesting matter because (except that it was made by more than 30 people – it was just the size of the core giant team) I would say that the fact is that it looks good and such is like a raw, powerhouse technical flatty that is rocking rock star flexible.
I loved the world’s visual and creative abilities, but everyone’s hair is trimmed with their necks, and I began to reuse the scattered assets permanently. This is no complaint, the brain. I like a reasonable budget and a sports scope.
Even when it is coming from a major developer, such as say, Atlas – I will take a straightforward graphics of metaphor: If the game is good, any day refantes. Rock star beer bottles can be shiny, but they are not mandatory for good times.
