The next battlefield game has just been in the early players for a while, the EA has decided to take a new angle on community testing by introducing Labs Initiative to its battlefield, which is a new way for players to test potential features for the upcoming game. The only problem is that, despite the NDA, participants have been leaking unprecedented game footage for the EA’s dislike.
This has been a repeated problem, but it seems as if we have found the ultimate straw: players openly discuss the features of ordinary SBMMs. Rumors about the next battle began to spread like a jungle fire with SBMM, most players responded negatively and said that either it was not needed or it would further damage the matches. In the Reddate post, a player shares PSA from David SarlandThe lead producers of the battlefield, are trying to calm the tension, saying that it is all temporary and is being done with light contacts. But when the wicked commentators accept the complaint’s answers, the community manager enters it.
“OK,” Community Manager T0TALFps says. “The labs of the battlefield are about the future construction and cooperation of the battlefield, and we want to do it properly. I want to remind everyone that things that are happening in the battlefield labs can go to the final end line. This is the biggest thing in the program.
“It allows us to be creative, allowing us to see what works with people, educated and informed opinions from those who are participating and possibly seek insects around the features. We want to implement this program for a long time, and you want to respond to this program.
He also said that lighting also sheds light, “how there is a special time and place to learn about new features and functions for the wider community, and this is not.” All the leaks that work are giving birth to unnecessary unrest and arguments because people discuss the features that may not make it in the final game.
PSA from David Sarland in BF Labs around the SBMM dispute. By R/battlefield
“Information and content that is shared is beyond context, and often with the story wrapped around it, which is damaging the trust and transparency that we want to establish.” “When it comes to listening to something beyond context, or reading about it, it is not the same when it comes to reading about something beyond context, compared to experiencing it.
“Although the internet’s short reputation can lure, it is open and our efforts to communicate openly. And honestly, if it is your intention, I ask where it is associated with the interests of our community.”
When we share it, it is just official and we are pleased with the topic in hand.
T0TALFps, Community Manager
We still know about the next battlefield that it is in modern times, it will bring back traditional classes and concentrated maps, and it will continue before April 2026. There is nothing to know, but it is also a short. Game Play TrailerThe only thing the second note is that it looks like a little battlefield 3.
So with a lack of information about the next game, it may be a temptation to find leaks or increase temporary Internet reputation to provide new information, but it is not good for the development of the game or working hard on it.
“We can all agree that we want to have an environment that allowed examination and cooperation once again.” “The more we want to be transparent.
So in the future, before being mad or enthusiastic at the leakage of the battlefield, perhaps it is better to keep this little tight butt in mind with T0talfps: “When it comes to features, content, functionality and much more, when we share it, it is just official and we feel comfortable with this topic.”
