Comedian Sarah Silverman and two other authors filed Copyright violations In 2023, against the meta platforms and the Openi, the pirate version of their work was accused of being used without permission to train AI language models. Meta has then argued that such use comes under the theory of fair use (Through the Reuters), But it seems that US Federal District Judge Vince Chhibria has been less affected by defense.
“You have companies that use copyright materials to produce a product that is capable of manufacturing an unlimited number of competitive products,” Chhbia told Meta’s lawyers in San Francisco last Thursday.
“You are changing dramatically, you can say the market, disastrous for this person’s work, and you are saying that you don’t even need to pay the license to this person … I don’t understand how it can be fairly useful.”
Under the law of American Right Publishing, Fair use There is a belief that allows the use of copyright substances without the clear permission of the copyright holder, examples of fair use include criticism, news reports, teaching and use for research.
It can be used as a positive defense in response to claims of copyright violations, though a number of factors are considered to decide whether to use the right to publish works is used fairly. The effect of use They are one of the tasks working on the market (or potential markets).
Meta has argued that its AI system “changes” to make it a new content, is to study copyright materials and use it fairly. However, Judge Chbiara does not agree with:
“It seems like a very unusual matter in this sense that even though the copy is for the purpose of a extreme change, but the markets for copyright works are more likely to flood,” said Chibaria.
Subsequently, Meta Attorney Cannon Shanmagam allegedly argued that copyright owners are not entitled to compete with competitiveness in the “Ideas of Ideas”, to which Chhibira replied:
“But if I’m going to steal things from the market of ideas to prepare my thoughts, this is a violation of the right publication, okay?”
However, it seems that Chibraia has also not provided so much evidence to overcome the potential impact of the Meta’s alleged behavior market in connection with the plaintiff, David Boys, with the David Boys, in connection with the case.
“It seems that you are telling me to speculate that Sarah Silverman’s memory market will be affected by billions of things that Lalma (Meta’s AI model) will eventually be able to create,” said Chhibaria, “Sarah’s memory market will be able to eventually be able to create.”
“And it’s not clear to me that it is.”
For this, everything has to be played, though Judge Chhabia is committed to keeping both sides into the appropriate account with the eyes of things. It also gives me the opportunity to publish a line that I always wanted to write: The matter continues. Yes, it’s just as satisfying as I thought.
