Behind the drug dealer Simulator 2, the bite, said he would “not pursue any legal action against Schedule 1 in any form or form” if it was in charge of calling shots.
If you have not been caught, scheduled 1 pop up since its inception at the end of March. This is a game that is about drugs: ‘Ming, branding’ M, selling, selling them, all of this good things. Just two weeks after its release, it was revealed that the film Games SA, the publisher of drug dealers Simulator 2 – a second game that is also about drugs, if this name was not already a dead gift – which was launched against Schedule 1 about the potential violation of copyright.
At least to say, this news did not was particularly well, which resulted in the review of drug dealer Simulator 2. It was partly due to the fact that many people immediately concluded that DDS2 Schedule 1 developer was prosecuted against TVGS. Immediately after the review bombing, the movie Games SA came up with a statement “There is no case here”, though it does not seem that it has done a lot to eliminate negative reviews.
Betterners themselves are coming out due to the entire defeat His own statementAs described Windows Central. This is summarized: It does not own IP and is not in charge of making these decisions. But if that were the case, that would not happen. Even if it feels some kind of resemblance between the two sports.
The statement states that “we want to say that, despite the fact that we see many similarities between sports, and that some aspects of Schedule 1 were probably affected by the DDS, we do not feel as developers that we are being robbed by someone.” It continues to say that Schedule 1 “has its own voice, freshness and ideas that derive from the concept of DDS1, but expand it and bring them in their shape and style.”
Bitterners say that playing sports and taking different inspirations from each other is “in a large quantity of sports development”, adding that “even if they sometimes cross some lines (they usually, a good thing for the industry and a good thing for overall gaming.”
The most important thing here is that the whole investigation has their own position. The statement states, “If we had a choice in it, we would not pursue any legal action against Schedule 1 in any form or form.” “Considering that we do not have DDSIP, we do not have a direct impact on the decisions about the investigation or our publisher’s policy. However, we have expressed our concerns and opinions directly.”
Bitterners end, saying that he is directly emphasizing his position of film Games SA, adding: “We want it to end well for all and do not want the affected person to face this kind of negative, fear or hatred. That’s why we make games, and that is not what we stand.”
I feel here for the botoners. Sometimes the interests of the developer publisher are not essential, which are already useless, but it becomes even more useless when these different ideas enter the earth through negative reviews. Even if he got some jaws here and there on the similarities of Schedule 1, it seems that the bottlers finally leave the situation alone, and I do not blame the developer for it.
Schedule 1 developer TVGS has continued to remain silent throughout the defeat, which is probably the most smart choice right now. Such conditions are not much entertained by anyone, and hopefully the whole thing will be resolved soon.
