GSYNC also worked much on my old monitor with the module compared to the “G-Sank” O LED TV (HDMIVRR).
I made a thread on it a few weeks ago, but I recently participated in a lot of cases, while G -Sanki looks like a fine for those who use the module.
And back when the FSR frame general was first introduced (I forspoken) It turned out that only G -Sank module monitors were able to be synchronized with him – who highlighted how he actually performs well.
My next monitor will definitely be one.
It is hoped that the new Medetic chips will fix it by offering the same performance at a lower price than the FPGA module.
They may be less flexible, but then, according to my knowledge, NVIDIA has never released the feature update for the current monitor, despite the use of FPGA.
But the G-Sync will still need specific G-Sync-competent meditative scale chips.
Aristechnica.com
It may also open the possibility of real G -sink in television.
I think if Nvidia VRR succeeds in implementing any variable gamma compensation for OLEDs to remove Flickr, as well as how the variable over drive works for LCDs, it will be a huge seller.
Hopefully the reason for this delay is that they realize that panels using KSF phosphorus are not suitable for it, and will use quantum dot instead.
Bloorbusters had a huge demo with nanosis that shows its difference:


You can see it very clearly in the G-Sync Pulsar Demo, where the picture is clear, but it has an ugly red/cinnamon color around the edges of everything:

If G. Sink Pluser works according to his claim, I may be convinced to add a non -Elder display to my setup (the way it works, I am not compatible with OLED at all).